




- Security grammar: Are you insecure when writing about unsecure technology?
- Crowdfunding scientific research: Interview with Experiment
- Is the all or nothing crowdfunding approach a good thing, or seriously flawed?
- Crowdfunding Campaign PR: An Interview with Mitch Rosenberg, KinderLab Robotics
- New enrollment period now open: Launch your First Crowdfunding Campaign Success Blueprint Program
- Free online event: How to drive enterprise technology sales with PR
- Myth #10: Prompt’s ten technology sales myths
- Myth #9: Prompt’s ten technology sales myths
- Myth #8: Prompt’s ten technology sales myths
- 8945

- Ars Technica
- BBC News Technology
- BoingBoing
- Boston Globe Technology
- Business Insider Tech
- CNET
- Computer Weekly
- Crave
- Econsultancy
- Engadget
- GigaOm
- HuffPost Tech
- Lifehacker
- Mashable
- Mass High Tech TechFlash
- MIT Technology Review
- New Scientist Tech
- NY Times Technology
- SC Magazine UK
- SC Magazine US
- TechCrunch
- TechRadar
- TED Technology
- The Guardian Technology
- The Register
- VentureBeat
- Wired
- Wired UK
- ZDNet
- ZDNet UK

- March 2020
- May 2019
- May 2016
- March 2016
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005

Archive for February, 2007
By PromptBoston
February 23rd, 2007
Blogging no guarantee of book deal
Blogging no guarantee of book deal
The front page of this week’s Sunday Times carried the news that 42 year old Judith O’Reilly has received a GBP70,000 advance from Viking Penguin for a book based on her fledgling blog, www.wifeinthenorth.com.
Two things stand out about this tale. Firstly, it’s doubtful that Mrs O’Reilly’s six-week-old blog would have received quite so much attention from agents, publishers and the Sunday Times if she had not been, until recently, Education correspondent on – you guessed it – the Sunday Times. Proof that even in the supposedly democratic world of Web 2.0, it’s not what you can do, but who you know…
Secondly, it perpetuates the myth that blogging is a good way for wannabe writers to score a book deal. In truth, very few blogs have so far been turned into books. Notable exceptions include Girl With A One-Track Mind, whose no-holds-barred sexblog made a successful transition to dead-tree media last summer, and Random Acts of Reality, the fascinating and frequently harrowing blog of London ambulance driver ‘Tom Reynolds’, which was bookified last August by Friday Books.
While blogging remains a fantastic way for budding writers to practise their craft, raise their profile and make industry connections, the participatory web also offers quicker and surer routes to getting published. Take lulu.com, the self-proclaimed ‘premier independent publishing marketplace for digital do-it-yourselfers’. Lulu lets you publish and sell your book yourself, by printing just the quantities you need.
It’s vanity publishing and there’s no quality control, but if selling your work is your goal, you could do worse than to publish through lulu and promote your book through your blog, rather than waiting for an agent or publisher to spot you.
tags: wifeinthenorth | book deals | lulu
By PromptBoston
February 21st, 2007
Obvious flogs Odeo to focus on Twitter
Obvious flogs Odeo to focus on Twitter
On December 29, we said:
‘Twitter‘s 2.0 credentials are impeccable: it’s a by-product of the Obvious Corporation, a company run by Blogger founder Evan Williams, and whose primary product is Odeo, an aggregator of podcasts and web radio stations. Expect the by-product to have eclipsed the main product by this time next…week, probably.‘
It may have taken slightly more than a week, but this is what Obvious Corp. had to say on its blog on Monday:
‘In the last few months, we here at Obvious have been increasingly focused on Twitter. As a result, our original product, Odeo, has not gotten the attention it deserves.
If you’re interested in Odeo and can make a serious offer – either in cash or the ability to invest in it while we retain some equity – email me (ev AT obvious) for more details.‘
How much more 2.0 can you get than trying to sell a web 2.0 platform through a blog post? For anyone interested in buying a prime mp3 and podcast aggregator site, Evan Williams has more info about Odeo’s potential value on his own blog.
If I were to lay bets on who might buy it, I might be tempted to put my money on the Hype Machine, the mp3 aggregator seemingly most beloved of music fans. Although two correct predictions in a row would be just spooky.
By PromptBoston
February 16th, 2007
YourSpace or mine?
‘I saw your face in a crowded place, and I don’t know what to do‘, whined squaddie-turned-popstar James Blunt in the inexplicably popular ‘You’re Beautiful’.
Oh, James. Did no one tell you about MySpace? As this San Francisco Chronicle article notes, Web 2.0 has somewhat altered the playing field regarding affairs of the heart.
It would only have required a little light stalking on Blunt’s part to find out the girl’s name. A quick Google search might turn up her MySpace page, which would inform him of her likes and dislikes and who she likes to hang out with.
Assuming she’s a classy chick, her MySpace page might link to a proper blog, perhaps written with Blogger or LiveJournal. Here the hapless James could find out what she eats for breakfast, what she watched on telly last night, and what her cats look like. He might scour her Flickr stream for photos of her laughing in sun-dappled meadows, and check out her last.fm profile to see what music she’s listening to right now.
(Hopefully not his!, you cry, sensibly.)
Having absorbed months or even years of her personal history, our hero might start to engage the young lady in conversation via witty, delicately flattering blog comments. After a suitably decorous period, he might email her at the address in her sidebar. At length they might move to instant messaging, for hours of unchaperoned flirting.
After weeks or months, they might arrange to meet up to see if they like each other in real life. She might no longer be quite such a mysterious angel, but there might be half a chance of it leading to something meaningful. And half a chance that Blunt might not inflict any more icky lovesick maunderings on the music-buying public.
Which, frankly, would be for the best.
By PromptBoston
February 9th, 2007
Home Office out of touch with online life
Home Office out of touch with online life
Statements made by the Home Secretary this week reveal that the government is frighteningly out of touch with the way people use the internet.
As part of the government’s drive to crack down on paedophilia and other sex offences, offenders may be forced to list their ‘online identity details’ – such as email addresses and chatroom usernames – on the Sex Offenders Register, John Reid said.
“If we did that we would then be able to set up mechanisms that would flag up anyone using those addresses or those identities to make approaches and contacts through some of the very popular internet spaces which are used by kids,” Reid told the BBC.
Any regular internet user will recognise this as nonsense. One person can have many email addresses, and can create a new one in minutes. Inventing a new username is as easy as thinking of a word and typing it into a box. A recent BBC story revealed that kids think nothing of creating a whole new online identity if they can’t remember the password for the old one.
Online identities aren’t unique, either. I share a username with a teenage MySpace user in Kansas, among other people. If he commits a crime, I don’t want to be punished for it. I’m sure he’d say the same about me.
Identity on the internet is a very fluid and unstable thing. Using screen names and email addresses as a basis for identifying people in real life should not be enshrined in law. Instead, the government should focus on helping young and vulnerable people to recognise and deal with suspicious online behaviour. However, I very much fear that young people are far more clued up about online life than anyone at the Home Office.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Home Office out of touch with online life
By Sean McManus
February 7th, 2007
DRM is killing music
Steve Jobs is urging the record companies to start selling music without DRM. Good move. If they stop adding copy protection to downloads, I might start buying them.
Don’t get me wrong: I’m not a pirate. I’ve never used peer to peer networks and my spend on music is probably my top entertainment expense. But it’s all CDs.
I’ve never bought a song from iTunes because of the digital rights management (DRM) that stops me from using music how I want. Music bought from iTunes has controls that stop you from playing it on portable digital devices not made by Apple. Even though I use an Ipod, I don’t want my music to be tied to a single device. Jobs argues only 3% of tracks in Ipods are sold via iTunes and so doubts the lock-in effect. But when it comes to music, you can’t argue quantity over quality. It’s not about whether I’d sacrifice 3% of my collection to switch providers. It’s about whether I can play my favourite songs when I want them, or whether I’ll have to pay twice for them.
I still play some CDs that I bought in the 80s. In 20 years’ time, I might want to play today’s new music for a nostalgia trip too. But if it can only be played on Apple devices, and they’re all kaputt, I’ll have to buy my music all over again, assuming someone is still selling it. Downloads are poor value, particularly when you add in the cost of having to buy an Apple device for playback.
It isn’t just downloads that are affected: near the office in Chiswick we have a branch of Fopp and I’ve seen quite a few ‘best-of’s being released at a bargain £3. The catch is that they include copy protection that stops you playing the music on an iPod. That’s no use to me either. They even had a CD for a pound I might have bought if it didn’t have DRM. But with DRM, it’s broken. It’s rubbish.
For anyone who wants to copy music, the restrictions are ineffective. The so-called ‘analogue hole’ means that there’s always a point where the music can be re-recorded. But for music fans who just want to buy music and listen to it on their choice of device, DRM deters sales.
By PromptBoston
February 1st, 2007
Google and News Corp square up over web video
Google and News Corp square up over web video
There’s been more jostling for position this week in the unpredictable world of online video. Google said it plans to pay users for original content uploaded to YouTube, in the same week as it got into a mighty battle with Fox over illegal uploads. Meanwhile, Fox’s parent News Corp. quietly entered the online video fray itself, acquiring a stake in Australian video-streaming outfit Roo.
Google’s plan to remunerate YouTube users emerged at the high-level talkfest that is the World Economic Forum. There are no details of payment schemes yet, but it suggests that Google may be concerned about users defecting to rivals like Revver, which pays its users a share of ad revenue. While Google has yet to crack the challenge of monetising user content on YouTube, its threefold revenue increase announced this week shows that it knows a thing or two about online advertising.
Meanwhile, there was a clash of old media and new media titans as Twentieth Century Fox subpoenaed Google into providing it with the name of a YouTube user who had uploaded new and unbroadcast episodes of The Simpsons and 24.
While Google mulls the threat of mega court action, it appears that this isn’t the only step the Murdoch empire is taking to gain control of online video sharing. Twentieth Century Fox’s parent, News Corporation, quietly bought a 5% stake this week in Australian online video firm Roo, which provides video streaming technology for News Corp websites like the UK’s Times Online and Sun Online, as well as the website of Fox News. Could Murdoch be gearing up to take on YouTube on his own terms? Watch this space.